At ExeQserve, we've always taken pride in our ability to customize programs to meet the unique needs of our clients. It is an ability that I brought over from my experience as a freelance training consultant. As we continue to customize programs for our clients, I had to ask myself, where should we draw the line in customizing our programs? I'd like to share my answers with you in the hope that you may find some important lessons you can apply in your own practice as the one in charge of looking for trainers or as a training facilitator.
I have always said that I like demanding clients because they keep me on my toes and push me to be better. When I say demanding clients, I mean clients who like to know the nitty-gritty of the program before approving it. I like that. Where I now draw the line is when a client pushes for some activities that I do not feel comfortable with. I use to tell myself that I should be open minded enough to try and see things from my clients' point of view and try out some of the materials they insist for me to include in the program. There are times when this leads to undesirable result which led me to conclude that being open minded shouldn't mean trying out everything but being willing to consider everything and accept or reject them accordingly.
Some companies who are trying to save on training cost often request that a two or three-day workshop be compressed into a one-day program or sometimes a half-day course. While I fully understand the limitation of money allocated by companies for training, I am totally against compressing programs to fit the budget. Why, because compressed programs cost more in the end due to low return on investment. On many occasions, depth of learning is the first thing to go when programs are shortened. When time is limited some facilitators aim for appreciation of concept rather than facilitate real learning which is the application of skills. You might ask, how do I deal with this type of situation? I don't go for compressing, I go for reducing learning objectives to what is possible given the time frame. This means that if the client is aiming for the participants to learn Planning, Leading, Organizing and Controlling but can only spend a day for it, I'd ask them to choose which one or two topics are their priority so we can design a program that will allow application of learning. I feel that this is more cost effective vs cramming everything within a short time span.
Finally, my pet peeve is having a hodgepodge of in-cohesive learning objectives. Some training managers come out with training requirement as a result of a confused training needs analysis. Some think that this is hitting several birds with one stone but I disagree. I believe in having a learning theme that cohesively puts learning modules together. I believe in having a framework that learners can look at and see how learning goals are pieced together. I also believe that some framework or concepts should not be compromised for the sake of customization,. when that happens, that's when I say that customization has gone too far.
Training is an important investment. If done well, it could yield considerable returns for the company. Customizing the program to meet the unique needs of the learners is fine as long as it does not compromise the quality of the learning.
Edwin Ebreo's essays sharing his experience as an HR Consultant in the Philippines.
This blog focuses on people management, training, team building, recruitment,
organization development,
employment and labor practices in the Philippines.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Is HR Department Dying?
Maybe, maybe not, but HR, the Department as we know it will cease to exist. More affordable technology, outsourcing and more HR-capable line managers will change the face of HR Department and render much of the work done by HRD redundant.
Future organizations will evolve with no or very lean HRD. Several things will factor in to that evolution.
Recruitment will be outsourced. Service providers will continue to grow their database and will become more and more efficient in serving their clients. Cost of recruitment service will become more affordable and viable option compared to having their own recruitment department. Recruitment service providers will invest in sharpening their agents' skills in sourcing and more accurate screening of candidates in order to win the competition among service providers but also to win against internal recruitment teams. They will also do this to increase profitability. Recruitment service providers will go the way of network banking. There will be "coopetion" among recruiters and this will make this industry a formidable force in the business of hiring people. Manpower augmentation companies will take care of project based and seasonal work. I'm hoping that there will be more stringent laws to protect the underprivileged and marginalized workers because the IT, engineering, finance and call center professionals can very well take care of themselves.
Most of HR transactional activities will be outsourced, automated or relegated. Time keeping and benefits administration will be outsourced, performance management will be automated and will become more effective and efficient. Whatever is left will be relegated to another department, maybe admin or finance.
Managers will take matters into their own hands as far as people development is concerned. It has already began. On several occasions, line managers have contacted me about their training needs. When I ask why they are the ones inquiring instead of HR or training department, they either say they don't have one or they don't trust that HR can do a decent job at it. Management training itself is going to change. It will give more and more time and attention to people management. Managers will appreciate this part of their job better. The more that they do, the more that they will feel some discomfort with HR specially if HR fails to cope with the changes going on in the organization.
Training itself or to better describe it, acquisition of knowledge and skills will change dramatically specially with the entrance of the millennials in the workforce. Knowledge workers will choose to Google, to learn new things or watch a how-to video in youtube. Resource persons will tap new media to convey their messages in order to earn new business or to earn from traffic. I doubt if facilitator-led training will disappear but it will diminish greatly in the future. Blended, self-paced and action learning will be the wave of the future. In the battle of survival of the fittest, only the best training professionals will remain.
What will happen to HR the profession? If HR plays its card right, it will become leaner but will also climb higher in the organization. Chief HR, or SVP HR will become as common place as CFO's. For large organizations, senior HR executives will be supported by HR Managers who may have no to very few contingents. They will play the role of internal consultants, the best value that HR professionals can contribute to their organizations. In some smaller companies, the head of operations will take over this role, Hence, there will be no HRD. HR professionals who want to stay doing tactical or transactional work will find themselves working in outsourcing agencies. Specialists will do consulting in their areas of expertise, mostly as members of consulting organizations or as freelancers. Companies will begin to see the benefit of entrusting their training funds to these consulting organizations because of their ability to broker better deals for them and their ability to distinguish between good resource persons and run-of-the-mill trainers.
HR-related careers will concentrate in the following areas:
This is a forecast, we don't really know for sure as to which direction the wind of change will blow but it would be pretty interesting how HR professionals or budding professionals will take all these. There are only two ways to respond to possibilities of change; to dismiss it or to prepare for it. To prepare for it, HR professionals need to acquire better conceptual skills. They need to be more strategic. They need to learn how to be effective consultants as well as how to be consultative. They need to gain the trust and respect of the organization. They need to build their reputation around giving solutions that truly respond to the need of the organization. They need to veer away from measuring their contribution in terms of "done-not-done" and start ensuring the positive organizational impact of what they do. HR needs to stop being order takers and start becoming HR Leaders.
Future organizations will evolve with no or very lean HRD. Several things will factor in to that evolution.
Recruitment will be outsourced. Service providers will continue to grow their database and will become more and more efficient in serving their clients. Cost of recruitment service will become more affordable and viable option compared to having their own recruitment department. Recruitment service providers will invest in sharpening their agents' skills in sourcing and more accurate screening of candidates in order to win the competition among service providers but also to win against internal recruitment teams. They will also do this to increase profitability. Recruitment service providers will go the way of network banking. There will be "coopetion" among recruiters and this will make this industry a formidable force in the business of hiring people. Manpower augmentation companies will take care of project based and seasonal work. I'm hoping that there will be more stringent laws to protect the underprivileged and marginalized workers because the IT, engineering, finance and call center professionals can very well take care of themselves.
Most of HR transactional activities will be outsourced, automated or relegated. Time keeping and benefits administration will be outsourced, performance management will be automated and will become more effective and efficient. Whatever is left will be relegated to another department, maybe admin or finance.
Managers will take matters into their own hands as far as people development is concerned. It has already began. On several occasions, line managers have contacted me about their training needs. When I ask why they are the ones inquiring instead of HR or training department, they either say they don't have one or they don't trust that HR can do a decent job at it. Management training itself is going to change. It will give more and more time and attention to people management. Managers will appreciate this part of their job better. The more that they do, the more that they will feel some discomfort with HR specially if HR fails to cope with the changes going on in the organization.
Training itself or to better describe it, acquisition of knowledge and skills will change dramatically specially with the entrance of the millennials in the workforce. Knowledge workers will choose to Google, to learn new things or watch a how-to video in youtube. Resource persons will tap new media to convey their messages in order to earn new business or to earn from traffic. I doubt if facilitator-led training will disappear but it will diminish greatly in the future. Blended, self-paced and action learning will be the wave of the future. In the battle of survival of the fittest, only the best training professionals will remain.
What will happen to HR the profession? If HR plays its card right, it will become leaner but will also climb higher in the organization. Chief HR, or SVP HR will become as common place as CFO's. For large organizations, senior HR executives will be supported by HR Managers who may have no to very few contingents. They will play the role of internal consultants, the best value that HR professionals can contribute to their organizations. In some smaller companies, the head of operations will take over this role, Hence, there will be no HRD. HR professionals who want to stay doing tactical or transactional work will find themselves working in outsourcing agencies. Specialists will do consulting in their areas of expertise, mostly as members of consulting organizations or as freelancers. Companies will begin to see the benefit of entrusting their training funds to these consulting organizations because of their ability to broker better deals for them and their ability to distinguish between good resource persons and run-of-the-mill trainers.
HR-related careers will concentrate in the following areas:
- Recruitment - Sourcing, screening and onboarding
- Training - This will be inhabited by professionals from various walks of life. HR Professionals will just be among the many people who are going to conduct training.
- Generalists/Specialists - Will act as internal (or external) consultants and will need to position themselves strategically in the organization if they are to make meaningful contribution in the company.
This is a forecast, we don't really know for sure as to which direction the wind of change will blow but it would be pretty interesting how HR professionals or budding professionals will take all these. There are only two ways to respond to possibilities of change; to dismiss it or to prepare for it. To prepare for it, HR professionals need to acquire better conceptual skills. They need to be more strategic. They need to learn how to be effective consultants as well as how to be consultative. They need to gain the trust and respect of the organization. They need to build their reputation around giving solutions that truly respond to the need of the organization. They need to veer away from measuring their contribution in terms of "done-not-done" and start ensuring the positive organizational impact of what they do. HR needs to stop being order takers and start becoming HR Leaders.
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)